Teachers’ perception and practice of assessing speaking skills in EFL classrooms: A case study at Wollo University, Ethiopia

Authors

Ayalew Yimer Wollo University, Ethiopia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8661-0574
Taye Regassa Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2837-4912

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2025.30.2.26

Keywords:

speaking assessment, teachers’ perception, EFL, speaking skills, assessment practices, oral proficiency

Abstract

Introduction. This study investigates the perceptions and classroom practices of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instructors at Wollo University, Ethiopia, regarding the assessment of speaking skills.

Purpose. The purpose of the research is twofold: to evaluate the alignment between instructors’ theoretical beliefs about speaking assessment and their actual practices, and to identify systemic and pedagogical barriers that undermine effective oral proficiency evaluation.

Methodology. Adopting a mixed-methods methodology, the study collected data from 20 instructors and 25 students through structured questionnaires, non-participant classroom observations, and in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and correlational statistics, while qualitative responses were thematically coded.

Results. The results demonstrate that while instructors universally emphasize the importance of speaking assessments for developing communicative competence, their implementation is largely restricted to logistically manageable methods such as group discussions (used by 90% of instructors) and oral presentations (75%). In contrast, more nuanced techniquessuch as role-plays (20%) and individualized interviews (15%) were rare due to reported constraints. Key challenges included time limitations (85% of instructors), large class sizes (80%), inadequate training in assessment design (70%), and limited institutional support for formative feedback. A weak but significant positive correlation (r = 0.135, p <0.05) between instructors’ perceptions and practices underscores the gap between intent and action.

Conclusion. The conclusions advocate for institutional interventions, including mandatory teacher training programs on alternative assessment models (e.g., digital portfolios, peer assessments), policy reforms to reduce class sizes, and the integration of automated tools. By bridging this gap, the study argues, universities can better align assessment practices with pedagogical goals, ultimately enhancing students’ oral proficiency in EFL contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ayalew Yimer, Wollo University, Ethiopia

Foreign Languages and Literature Department, Lecturer (M.A), Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.

Taye Regassa, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Ph.D., Foreign Language and Literature, Assistant Prof. (Ph.D.) HLJC, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

References

Adem, H., & Berkessa, M. (2022). A case study of EFL teachers’ practice of teaching speaking skills vis-à-vis the principles of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2087458

Alvarez, C. L., Tamayo, M. R., & Santos, J. C. D. (2024). Factors influencing the development of speaking skills among Ecuadorian EFL learners: Teachers’ perspectives. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i2.74889

Anshori, M. I. (2023). Improving Students’ Speaking Ability through Morning English Program Extracurricular Activities in Indonesia. Educational Challenges, 28(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2023.28.2.02

Ashraf, H., & Zolfaghari, S. (2018). EFL teachers’ assessment literacy and their reflective teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 425–436. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1165237

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education.

Chufama, M., & Sithole, F. (2021). The pivotal role of diagnostic, formative and summative assessment in higher education institutions’ teaching and student learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 4(5), 5–15. https://ijmrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/IJMRAP-V4N4P107Y21.pdf

DeLuca, C., Holden, M., & Rickey, N. (2024). From challenge to innovation: A grassroots study of teachers’ classroom assessment innovations. British Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4065

Derakhshan, A., Tahery, F., & Mirarab, N. (2015). Helping Adult and Young Learners to Communicate in Speaking Classes with Confidence. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p520

Dewan, M. S., & Sharma, B. D. (2025). Enhancing Oral Communication in English as a Second Language. Journal of Tikapur Multiple Campus, 8(8), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.3126/jotmc.v8i8.75949

Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021). Teaching languages to adolescent learners. In Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869812

Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.

Güneş, D., & Girgin, U. (2025). When extending wait-time is not enough for student participation: Eliciting student responses during L2 whole-class speaking. System, 135, 103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103841

Harding, L. & Kremmel, B. (2016). 25. Teacher assessment literacy and professional development. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Ed.), Handbook of Second Language Assessment (pp. 413-428). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-027

Hasrol, S. B., Zakaria, A., & Aryadoust, V. (2022). A systematic review of authenticity in second language assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100023

Hasselgreen, A., Carlsen, C., & Helness, H. (2004). European survey of language testing and assessment needs report: Part one – General findings. European Association for Language Testing and Assessment. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:202695479

Holubnycha, L., Kostikova, I., Besarab, T., & Koshechkina, T. (2025). Teaching methods for large student groups at a Chinese university. Educational Challenges, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2025.30.1.02

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732980

Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2016). Key Themes, Constructs and Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Second Language Pronunciation Assessment. In T. Isaacs, & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 3-11). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/ISAACS6848

Kadir, J. S., Zaim, M., & Refnaldi, R. (2019). Developing instruments for evaluating validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the authentic assessment for speaking skill at junior high school. Proceedings of the Sixth of International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT 2018) (pp. 98–105). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoelt-18.2019.14

Knoch, U., & Elder, C. (2013). A framework for validating post-entry language assessments (PELAs). Studies in Language Assessment, 48–66. https://doi.org/10.58379/yzlq8816

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017

Nieminen, J. H., Atjonen, P., & Tolvanen, A. (2024). Diversity of assessment practices and student perceptions of assessment in Finland. The Curriculum Journal, 36(2), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.288

O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2016). The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 48, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.003

Oudghiri, A., & Ibrahimi, A. (2025). The Assessment of Language Skills: Tools and Methods. In Supporting Personalized Learning and Students' Skill Development with AI (pp. 369-388). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Pill, J., & Harding, L. (2013). Defining the language assessment literacy gap: Evidence from a parliamentary inquiry. Language Testing, 30(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480337

Rad, M. R. (2019). The impact of EFL teachers’ assessment literacy on their assessment efficiency in classroom. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 1(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v1i1.14

Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited: A proposed Measurement Framework and Meta‐Analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345

Sitepu, D. N., Situmeang, S. L., Sembiring, R. V., Saragih, D. C., & Silalahi, D. E. (2025). Effectiveness of Language Assessment Tests: An Observation Based on Reliability, Validity, Authenticity, Practicality, and Washback Principles in Class 7a at SMP Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(4), 4711–4722. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i4.20752

Sook, K. H. (2003). The types of speaking assessment tasks used by Korean Junior Secondary School English teachers. Asian EFL Journal, 5(4), 1–11.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Yimer, A., & Regassa, T. (2025). Teachers’ perception and practice of assessing speaking skills in EFL classrooms: A case study at Wollo University, Ethiopia. Educational Challenges, 30(2), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2025.30.2.26